How that relates to the Commissioners' attempts at ethical
investment I'm not sure. All the stuff about disinvesting from companies that
don't take their carbon-reduction responsibilities seriously is all well and
good, but the Commissioners still have plenty invested in fossil-fuel
extraction firms. They quote examples where 'active engagement' has helped
encourage ExxonMobil and Shell to put concrete carbon reduction targets in
place. They argue this provides 'greater leverage and influence than by acting
alone or by forced divestment', in line with a decision
in General Synod two years ago that they should be threatening
complete disinvestment by 2023 unless the fuel companies complied.
I'm sure it does, but that doesn't change the fundamental truth that we need these industries to cease. Basically, they can't be 'fixed'. The Commissioners probably said the same sorts of things about cigarettes and arms manufacturing, but they eventually got out of them, albeit kicking and screaming.
No comments:
Post a Comment