Back in Lamford I was given a beautiful Victorian home-communion set which had been owned by a previous incumbent of the parish, but that got stolen. So I bought another from eBay, slipping out of a meeting to bid for it on the church office computer. I've never mentioned it before so thought I would post a picture of it. The paten is engraved: 'Presented with a cheque to THE REV. E.C.HAYWARD, B.Sc., A.T.C.L., by the Congregation & Parish of ST. BARNABAS' CHURCH, HEATON, BRADFORD, as a sincere token of affection & high regard for his FAITHFUL MINISTRY, 1936-1941'. I rather like the idea that the set was rescued from potential collectors and restored to use.
I used it yesterday, in fact, going to take the last rites to a member of the church who very probably only has a couple of days to live. I'd been to take communion to Jeff many times at home since he became unable to get to church, and he was able to receive the sacrament again, though not to speak. We do what we can, and leave the rest to God.
Tuesday, 9 September 2014
Friday, 5 September 2014
Some Confusion
I was more interested, immediately, in the advice on safeguarding. Mr Consultant was adamant that the legislation stated that employees in schools only needed DBS clearance on entry to a new post, and that volunteers should not be put through the process, as their interactions with children are supposed to be controlled by proper supervision. 'If you're being told that DBS clearances have to be renewed, or that volunteers should be DBSed, it's a waste of time and money. It isn't what the legislation says.' This is peculiar as I have just myself gone through the clearance process again: the diocese is very clear that DBS is only 'valid' for five years and that mine was about to 'expire'. Meanwhile all our volunteers are indeed being put through. We have an issue at the moment with an elderly lady member of the congregation who helps out with the children's groups and who couldn't supply sufficient proof of identity: she'd never had a driving licence, never been abroad so had no passport, and had changed her name after divorce many years ago, so her birth certificate was ambiguous. None of her utility bills showed the name by which she was actually known. 'If she can't find enough documents all she can do is have a DNA test', was the response.
Wednesday, 3 September 2014
Slips on the Critical Path
We don't get many weddings at Swanvale Halt. Brides, I suspect, don't necessarily warm to the idea of being confronted by the Co-Op when they emerge from their wedding ceremony, and try to go somewhere else if they can. That means I find myself organising the banns for couples getting married elsewhere far more often than I get requests for weddings here.A third reason is that something's been screwed up in the legal preliminaries for the wedding. Yesterday I saw two couples getting married in local churches this coming Saturday who'd suddenly found out that something had gone wrong in their case: the first had moved a couple of months ago and forgotten to have their banns read in their new parish church, and the second live just outside the parish where they're getting married and didn't realise they had to have their banns read there too - the vicar's email had gone into a junk inbox. So they all needed a Common Licence which meant coming to me to swear an oath. Just to make things slightly more interesting, the lady of the first couple is a divorcee, meaning that the bishop had to give his explicit permission for them to apply for a licence (this is how the Church gets around some of its members disapproving of divorcees remarrying in church).
I'd spoken to the lady I deal with at the Bishop's Registry about the first couple and she warned me another case would be coming through. 'There's a lot of this at the moment', she told me with some weariness. 'People come back from holiday and clergy come back from holiday and find that something they thought had been done hasn't been.' The summer is definitely over.
Monday, 1 September 2014
You Wait For Ages
It took a while to start taking funeral services after I was ordained: in Lamford in summer 2005 we went for weeks without any at all. Once I got going, though, I probably took 20 or so over the course of the year and Il Rettore did the same. That wasn't particularly impressive compared to the way it would have been once upon a time, nor to other places elsewhere: any time I spoke to my old vicar in his new Yorkshire parish he ended the conversation with 'I've got to go and get ready for a funeral, that's five this week', making one wonder how many people were actually left in the town.
How different all that is now. A few short years later and most clergy find they're doing a paltry number of funerals. I've taken only a couple this year, and even though it's true that I try to channel those that do come up towards our curate so she can have the practice, nevertheless even with hers added to the total I don't think we're into double figures since July last year. The local undertakers are quite apologetic about it, but the fact is that most people choose secular celebrants to take their services, even if those celebrants apparently quite often find themselves asked to incorporate the Lord's Prayer and the 23rd Psalm into the services they assemble. The generation that automatically assumed the local vicar is the right person to see you out of this world has passed and the consumer mentality has affected this aspect of human life as much as others.
And all of a sudden I have three funerals to do in the course of ten days, one of which is a burial - I haven't buried anyone for three or four years. I sat with a family going through the details of their mum's service the other day and had to struggle to remember what I usually say in such circumstances, which once upon a time tripped off my tongue with smooth facility. None of the deceased people are members of the Swanvale Halt congregation and only one attended church anywhere at all.
How different all that is now. A few short years later and most clergy find they're doing a paltry number of funerals. I've taken only a couple this year, and even though it's true that I try to channel those that do come up towards our curate so she can have the practice, nevertheless even with hers added to the total I don't think we're into double figures since July last year. The local undertakers are quite apologetic about it, but the fact is that most people choose secular celebrants to take their services, even if those celebrants apparently quite often find themselves asked to incorporate the Lord's Prayer and the 23rd Psalm into the services they assemble. The generation that automatically assumed the local vicar is the right person to see you out of this world has passed and the consumer mentality has affected this aspect of human life as much as others.
And all of a sudden I have three funerals to do in the course of ten days, one of which is a burial - I haven't buried anyone for three or four years. I sat with a family going through the details of their mum's service the other day and had to struggle to remember what I usually say in such circumstances, which once upon a time tripped off my tongue with smooth facility. None of the deceased people are members of the Swanvale Halt congregation and only one attended church anywhere at all.
Labels:
Christianity and society,
funerals,
parish life
Friday, 29 August 2014
Praying Positions
There was a time when I found it impossible to pray indoors. I don't mean reading or reciting prayers, but longer-scale, silent, sitting-alone-and-concentrating kind of prayer. I think the noises and sensations of the outdoors made it easier to forget all the various chatter that clutters up one's mind and silencing which is part of the point of prayer. So when I was in Lamford I tended to go and sit in a shelter in the garden, and here I have done the same - although until recently when I built the Grotto there wasn't really anywhere to escape from rain when there was rain.
Gradually I found myself more and more reluctant to go outside for my early-morning prayers. This was mainly because there was a spell of bad weather a couple of years ago when the meteorological conditions would have provided somewhat too much of a distraction from my own thoughts, and encouraged me to stay indoors instead. But eventually I would look out at the garden and take a slight breeze shaking the upper branches of the oak tree as a good enough reason not to venture out.
This was clearly little more than laziness linked to a reluctance to pray generally. As part of my discipline I aim at having a second short prayer session between noon and 1pm, if I happen to be at home to do it; my resistance to complying with this observance shocks even me, and I am at something of a loss to account for it. It should not be the case that concerted contact with God is something I subconsciously try to avoid, yet it seems to be at the root of my hesitancy.
I now try to go outside and stay indoors to pray roughly on alternate days, though I'm not completely sure, these days, what effect either has.
Gradually I found myself more and more reluctant to go outside for my early-morning prayers. This was mainly because there was a spell of bad weather a couple of years ago when the meteorological conditions would have provided somewhat too much of a distraction from my own thoughts, and encouraged me to stay indoors instead. But eventually I would look out at the garden and take a slight breeze shaking the upper branches of the oak tree as a good enough reason not to venture out.
This was clearly little more than laziness linked to a reluctance to pray generally. As part of my discipline I aim at having a second short prayer session between noon and 1pm, if I happen to be at home to do it; my resistance to complying with this observance shocks even me, and I am at something of a loss to account for it. It should not be the case that concerted contact with God is something I subconsciously try to avoid, yet it seems to be at the root of my hesitancy.
I now try to go outside and stay indoors to pray roughly on alternate days, though I'm not completely sure, these days, what effect either has.
Friday, 22 August 2014
Choose Your Change
I mentioned in my last post about Swanvale Halt’s ecumenical
history, and the Swanvale Sisters’ role in that. By accident the other day I
came across the website of Revd Murdoch Mackenzie, who had connections with the
Sisters and the organisations that succeeded to their work after the community
itself came to an end in 1989: he had worked in India with Sister Caroline who
had founded the Sisterhood. On the website is the text of a lecture from 2002 given
by Revd Mackenzie headed ‘Christianity Must Change or Die’, which is the sort
of title that makes you scan an eye over a bit of text if nothing else.
As the author points out, changing, in spiritual language
dying to self and rising to something new, is what Christianity is about,
figuratively and very literally in terms of what happens to Jesus. No
individual Christian or Christian institution can avoid engaging with
dying-that-we-may-live. But it’s abundantly easy to tell yourself that at the
same time as shying away from thinking about those actual, concrete things to which we must die, the ways in which we must change: working that out
is far harder.
The answers proponents of Change give to that question are revealing.
Murdoch Mackenzie reveals a rage at the encasing of Christians within dogmatic
denominational boundaries which he struggled against for decades, and wants to
see them disappear: they are all reflections, he argues, of how human beings
have re-created the ‘religion’ which Christ abolished on the Cross. I have a
great deal of sympathy with that. But then he starts to discuss the Eucharist
as a prime example of how ‘religion’ has crept back into the humble, simple
faith of Jesus. ‘It began just as a meal around a breakfast table’ he says
(actually there is quite some debate about that) and it’s that to which we
should essentially return. It’s clear that when Revd Mackenzie talks about the
Church ‘changing’, the kind of change
he envisages is in the direction of a purified Protestantism, a shape of
Christian life which he equally clearly favours for strongly-held ideological
reasons.
I often find that people who demand that Christianity changes have already decided firmly what
that change should look like; but this is to demand really that other Christians change, not themselves.
Not to specify in advance what the change should be, but to wait to see what
arises from discussion, interaction, thought, and necessity – the ways in which
the Holy Spirit speaks to the Church – is far more risky. I am happy,
basically, with the way we do things at Swanvale Halt: I like Catholic Anglican
worship and if there were to be a ‘change’ to my taste it would be more in the
Catholic direction than less. But that’s not good enough. Standstill is no good
to the Spirit, and nor is reshaping a church community simply according to my
own predilections: it may be them to which I
must inwardly die. When we do change, it will be driven by a reassessment
of our basic purposes, and contact with new situations and new people, and it’s
likely not to look completely like anything we envisage before we begin.
Wednesday, 20 August 2014
Rubbing Along
Swanvale Halt parish has a history of involvement with
ecumenism, the effort to foster positive relations between Christian
denominations. For some years the parish housed the Swanvale Sisters, a group
of women dedicated to praying for inter-church unity which had been established
by a former deaconess of the Church of South India, and the sisters often came
to address the congregation. This year marks the fortieth anniversary of our
sharing the church building with the local Roman Catholic congregation who
squeeze their Sunday mass in between our two.
The composition for that event was four members of local
Charismatic congregations, four Anglicans, and one Roman Catholic. The
experience is not entirely an uncomplicated one as the Charismatics tend to be
vocal in their prayers and the Anglicans tend to incorporate more silence. I
can let it wash over me to a certain degree, and doing some thinking about it
came to see the sort of torrent of words you get with Charismatic prayer as
being in some sense a groping after the same suspension of ego and the seeking
of God that absolute silence aims for – a different kind of silence. Not everyone can manage that, though. We’ve had a
couple of members of our church who’ve tried this group and have decided not to
come back. You have to be very robust and settled in your own prayer life not
to be disconcerted by a different style. For me the only very hard moment was
when a member of the local Free Evangelical church who our curate didn’t know
and who had never been to the group before began praying about the Eastern
European care assistants on the staff of a local home where she works – ‘They’re
often staunch Roman Catholics, Lord, and we just pray that you will enable them
to be released from their darkness’ – unaware there was a Roman Catholic sat
yards away from her. There will have to be some ground rules set down (such as
no praying against other Christian Churches), and some minimal structure placed
on the proceedings so that silent
silence doesn’t get squeezed out.
That said, our two lay Anglican attenders were entirely
comfortable with the way things went. One, Mary, is a former Companion of the
Swanvale Sisters and commented later ‘while
I have previously experienced the Charismatic Movement from time to time,
nevertheless it was not in conjunction with other Christian Groups, so
this is a very unique venture that we’re fostering, and we will stick with it!’
Plus it’s worth remembering what a journey into the unknown our Charismatic
colleagues are taking – walking past a statue of the Blessed Virgin with a
candle next to it and praying in a chapel beside an altar surrounded by Gothic
arches and with the Sacrament reserved in an aumbry in the wall.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


