As usual whenever I lead a service where I can expect
the congregation will include people of a variety of different opinions, I
began by acknowledging the possibility that some might not want to say some
Christian things, but if so they should just keep Paula in mind; and in my homily – which
was about the ambiguities and sacrifices implied in the idea of ‘community’ – I referred to the different ways Christians and non-believers might think about
and describe the process of learning to live with diversity and conflict. A
young woman who works for one of the charities Paula is supporting during her
year as Mayor came up to me after the service, and told me ‘I was quite emotional
during the service because as a humanist it’s the first time I can ever remember
being specifically included in a religious event. Normally I expect just to let
it all go past me, but this time I felt I was welcome’.
How affirming that was! Until I opened my bible this morning
and read 1Thessalonians 2.4, ‘we speak not to please mortals, but to please God,
who tests our hearts’. I do have an intense dislike of making people sad. If I
was challenged to name my strongest motivation in life, I would say that I
wanted everyone to be happy. I know they can’t be because some end up wanting
things that are incompatible with the happiness of others, and many of us
fallen souls wrap ourselves in delusions which need to be eroded before we find
happiness; but is it a reprehensible thing to aim at? It might be, if my true instinct
is less to avoid pain for others, than too avoid the pain I experience by causing it to them. I suppose my only
security is that it is indeed God who tests my heart. Nor can you be confident
that a course of action which brings people unhappiness is ipso facto pleasing
to the Lord.
I became a believer in 1995, and nearly thirty years
later still don’t know with any clarity where the boundary lies between the
saved and the lost, or which side of it the young woman who spoke to me yesterday
falls; or where I do, for that matter. I leave it to God, and throw myself and
others on his mercy. What else can I do?
The Church has never before really faced a situation in
which a previously believing culture decides that Christianity is something it
wants to turn away from. The first apostles preached to Jews, and the task was to convince them that Jesus of Nazareth was the fulfilment
of what they already believed; and to Gentile pagans, for whom ‘God’ was another
deity like the ones they already knew. The Scriptures really give us very
little clue as to how to approach a world which has judged the Church and found
it wanting, or judged Christianity and found it unconvincing, nor do they tell
us what God thinks about such a situation.
As the Church of England sacks the ‘independent’ safeguarding advisors it employed to hold it to account precisely because it didn’t agree with the way they were holding it to account, it seems that the Church’s desire for power and security still hasn’t been sufficiently burned out of it, and there is more disciplining yet to go. I increasingly feel that the task of this generation’s believers is to begin, just begin, the work of convincing the world that Christians are not monsters, made monstrous by belief in a monstrous God. A modest aim, but one we will struggle with enough.
No comments:
Post a Comment