Like most people who weren’t gay men in London in the 1950s and early ‘60s, my first introduction to Polari was Julian & Sandy on Round the Horne. Bona to vada your dolly old eek, and so on,
all very amusing in context and radical in its day, even though Kenneth
Williams was, as far as mainstream audiences were concerned, so far into the
closet he was virtually in Narnia. I almost felt like greeting the congregation
in Polari this morning, but wasn’t sure very many people would get the joke.
Still, I have been known to use the word ‘bona’ in a wide variety of
inappropriate situations. It confuses my American friends, I can tell you.
What a fuss there’s been about the Polari Evensong service
celebrated a couple of weeks ago at the august Anglican vicar-factory, Westcott
House in Cambridge .
So much so that the College authorities have apologised, crawlingly, for this
‘experiment in queering the liturgy’, which seems a bit rough on the students
who put the service together. No, I wouldn’t have felt very comfortable
addressing the Holy Trinity as ‘the Auntie, the Omi Chavvie, and the
Fantabulosa Fairy’, but it’s not as though it was some kind of
officially-sanctioned liturgy that’s going to be added to Common Worship in the next revision. It really doesn’t matter that
much. I’ve had to grit my teeth through an act of worship in which the Lord’s
Prayer was ‘re-gendered’ and the focus of our adoration was a pebble in a bowl
of water, and I still survived the experience. It’s fine.
Others have defended the jokey service in vigorous terms.
‘What’s the difference between a service in Polari and one in Cockney Rhyming
Slang?’ they ask at the parish of Kilburn and West Hampstead. ‘A: The Church wishes gay people didn’t exist.’ This blog argues that ‘what makes people cringe’ about the Polari-rendering of
religious language and imagery, changing the mode of addressing God from Lord
to Duchess, is gender, and reveals the profound discomfort the Church has not so
much with gays as with the Female.
Now, I went to a theological college where male students
were referred to by girls’ names and the moniker awarded to our Father
Principal when he was a student was a
whispered secret, revealed to us by a visiting priest who’d known him in those
days (it was Sylvia Stardust, allegedly). I am, therefore, no stranger to camp,
and recognise its dangers. What the defenders of the Polari Evensong miss is
that it isn’t actually an exercise in homosexuality or femaleness, but camp.
The use of feminine titles for God is a different argument which we can have
another time: the issue with calling God ‘Duchess’ or ‘Auntie’ is that it
arises from a culture whose self-defensive humour involves not actual femaleness, but the burlesquing
of femaleness by men. It’s intentionally parodic, exaggerated, ludicrous. Camp
is a complex mode of humour which is used to negotiate ambiguity, discomfort,
and dichotomies between ideals and realities: no wonder it finds an honoured
place among those training for the priesthood. The Chris tian
life involves an inevitably painful awareness of the distance between what we
are and what we are supposed to be. But let camp anywhere near actual matters of faith and its humour
becomes less a way of defending oneself against outside persecution – which is
what Polari was supposed to do – than defending oneself against truth, avoiding
dealing with painful matters, not engaging with anything that might demand we change and develop. Of pushing God as far away from us as we can
manage, making him (sic) safe and controlled, locking him in our own box. That's the problem.
I’m not telling you what my ‘name in religion’ was, by the
way.
"I’m not telling you what my ‘name in religion’ was, by the way."
ReplyDeleteWe just don't care, Jemima.
It was much more glamorous than that, for heaven's sake.
DeleteOn a more serious note, I find your thoughts on the relationship between camp and certain types of religious sensibility quite compelling. But why no marked campness in other religions, or even in the other wing of the C of E? Presumably that distance between what we are and what we are supposed to be is experienced just as keenly. Admittedly, Jews have brilliant irony; but an equivalent seems to be lacking elsewhere. Literalism, maybe?
ReplyDeleteThat's a very good point, which I hadn't thought of. In fact, it does seem to be specifically Anglican: I recall a conversation with my spiritual director discussing how the camp culture was entirely absent from the Roman Catholics he knew. I wonder whether it arises from the ambiguous nature of Anglo-Catholicism specifically, its conflicted relationship with authority, tradition, sexuality, and other things besides.
Delete